|
APP
3-10, Appointment Policies for Academic Senate Titles
Covers
such issues as recruitment deadlines, and proposing an appropriate
title, step, and salary.
|
ACADEMIC
SENATE TITLES
3-10.
Appointment Policies
An
appointment (as distinguished from a reappointment, merit increase,
or promotion) occurs when a person is employed with the University
for the first time, or when a University employee is appointed
to a title in a different personnel program or academic series.
This section will cover some of the University and campus policies
pertaining to the appointment of members of the Academic Senate
(see APP 1-20
for a list of Senate titles); however, all persons involved in
the appointment review process must also refer to policies contained
in the Academic Personnel Manual and pertinent sections of this
manual for more detailed statements of policies affecting use
of titles, criteria for appointment, affirmative action, the review
process, etc.
A.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF DEPARTMENT CHAIR
1.
Funding (APM Policy 220-16)
It is the policy of the University of California that no appointment
shall be made to a title in the Professor series or the Lecturer
with Security of Employment series unless there is an appropriately
budgeted provision ("FTE") for the appointment. No appointment
should be forwarded for review unless such a provision, funded
at the proposed salary level, is available.
It
is the responsibility of the chair, prior to forwarding the
file to Academic Personnel, to assure that funding is or will
be available for those departmental appointees who are funded
from other sources.
2.
Recruitment (APM Policies 500 through 570)
a.
Affirmative Action
A thorough and determined search must be made both inside and
outside the University for candidates, including candidates
who are minorities, women, handicapped persons, disabled veterans,
and Vietnam-era veterans. Department chairs and/or heads of
programs and organized research units must insure compliance
with the letter and the spirit of affirmative action policy.
Formal paperwork documenting the search is required for all
appointments to Senate titles. Detailed recruiting and affirmative
action procedures are described in APP 2-10.
b.
Employment Eligibility (APM Policy 530)
The
Immigration Reform and Control Act of November 6, 1986,
requires that all employees provide verification of
eligibility to work in the United States. The federal government
has designated the I-9 Form, Employment Eligibility
Verification, as the document to be used in this verification
process.
During
recruitment, special attention must be given to the employment
eligibility of any non-immigrants in the pool to be sure that
such candidates can obtain visas which allow compensation
for services. Questions may be referred to the Office of International
Services.
c.
Titles
The
title proposed for an appointee must be appropriate for the
function and duties the candidate will perform. Special attention
must be paid to the criteria for appointment in the selected
title or series as outlined in the Academic Personnel Manual,
Policies 200 through 283.
d.
Timing of Offer (APM Policies 510-80-c and APM 500-16-c)
Chairs
are reminded that UCI policy requires that offers be made
before April 1 to other UC campuses and May 1
to all other institutions if they are to be effective in the
following academic year. (These dates are the deadlines for
formal offers to be made by the Executive Vice Chancellor
or the Chancellor; therefore, dossiers supporting appointments
need to be in Academic Personnel earlier.)
e.
Recruiting from Another UC Campus (APM Policies 510-0 and
510-80)
University
policy states that it is the obligation of those involved
in the consideration of an intercampus recruitment to pay
due regard to the welfare of the University as a whole as
well as to the wishes of the particular appointee and to the
effect of the proposed transfer on the two campuses directly
concerned.
Prior
to the initiation of negotiation for an intercampus recruitment,
the Chancellors of the two campuses involved shall be informed
of the proposed transfer. Ten working days before making the
formal offer of appointment to the candidate, which offer
shall be in writing, the Chancellor of the hiring campus shall
indicate such intention to the Chancellor of the campus from
which the appointee will be transferring. In all cases, the
Chancellor of the campus to which the appointee is transferring
shall also notify the Office of the President.
In
1997 the Office of the President issued the following additional
guidelines in the event that one UC campus recruits a faculty
member from another UC campus
(1)
A review for the recruitment of a faculty member from
another UC campus cannot proceed at the campus level until
the Chancellor of the campus from which the faculty member
is being recruited has been officially informed. The Chancellor
of the recruiting campus will provide information about the
proposed salary and other recruitment inducements being offered
to the other Chancellor.
(2)
The salary offered by the recruiting campus can be no
more than one step, or the equivalent of one step, above
the faculty member's current salary. If the faculty member's
salary is already an off-scale salary, the recruiting campus
may offer the next higher step along with the same percentage
increment. If the home campus is in the process of granting
a salary increase to become effective July 1, the recruiting
campus may offer one step above that increase, pending approval
by the home campus. The home campus is permitted to make
a counter offer equivalent to that of the recruiting campus.
If both the home and the recruiting campus agree, higher
salary offers may be made. An offer which includes a promotion
is permitted if the salary offer is no more than one step
above the current salary rate, including off-scale, as described
above.
If
the faculty member being recruited by another UC campus
also is being recruited by an outside institution, then
either the home and/or the recruiting UC campus may make
a counter offer higher than that described in (2) in order
to compete with the outside offer.
(3)
Presidential approval must be sought if the package of start-up
costs and other inducements (excluding housing assistance)
exceeds $500,000 for faculty in the laboratory sciences,
and $250,000 for other faculty.
(4)
In any proposed intercampus recruitment, either Chancellor
may request mediation or intervention by the Office of the
President, even when this is not triggered by (2) or (3)
above.
In
the event that any unit at UCI considers recruiting a faculty
member from another UC campus, Academic Personnel will coordinate
the notification of the other UC campus. Please notify Academic
Personnel as early in the process as is reasonably possible,
and certainly before any tentative offer is made.
NOTE:
"Faculty" in this policy means members of the Academic Senate.
Thus, this policy must be followed in all cases where the
candidate is in the Professor, Professor in Residence, or
Professor Clinical______ series, or holds a title as Lecturer
SOE or Senior Lecturer SOE at the current home campus.
f.
Competing Offers to An Outside Candidate from Two or More
UC Campuses (APM Policy 500-16-g)
University
policy is that the same level of salary shall be offered by
each campus with coordination of the appropriate salary level
to be arranged by the Office of the President. The following
procedure is to be followed to make this coordination possible:
When it becomes known to any campus administrative officer
that another campus of the University is also recruiting an
individual for a tenured appointment, that officer is obliged
to inform the Chancellor who shall, in turn, inform the Office
of the President. The latter will then consult with each of
the Chancellors concerned with the matter and will arrange
for the determination of a single appropriate salary.
3.
Department Recommendation
Recommendations
concerning appointments normally originate with the department
chair, who writes on behalf of the department. The letter of
recommendation should provide a comprehensive assessment of
the candidate's qualifications together with detailed evidence
to support this evaluation. The letter should also present a
report of consultation with the members of the department and
should discuss the reasons for any dissenting opinions. In addition
to the letter of recommendation, the department chair is expected
to assemble and submit to the Chancellor an up-to-date biography,
including a list of publications, together with copies of the
research publications or other scholarly or creative work.
If
the chair sends a tentative offer letter to the candidate selected
by the department, the letter should indicate that final approval
of the appointment must come from either the Executive Vice
Chancellor, the Chancellor, or the President. The following
sample letter shows the recommended wording for such a tentative
offer letter:
|
Dear
Professor _____________ :
I
am happy to inform you that our Department of ______________
intends to recommend you for appointment as ______________,
at a salary of ____________, effective July 1,
____. As you may know, appointments at the University
of California are only made by the Chancellor of the
campus in consultation with higher reviewing agencies,
including the dean of the school and the campus Committee
on Academic Personnel. Approval of departmental recommendations
is not automatic, and departmental recommendations
do not constitute actual offers. Following the review
process, a formal offer of appointment will be extended
by the Chancellor.
|
B.
SALARIES (APM POLICY 600)
1.
Academic Salary Scales
Academic salaries are based upon salary scales. These are published
and issued through Academic Personnel.
2.
Rank and Step
When
establishing the rank and step for a proposed appointee, a department
should give due consideration to the candidate's experience,
accomplishments, and standing relative to others at the same
level.
Criteria
for the use of "over-lapping" steps and for special steps, such
as Professor, Step VI, and Professor, Above Scale, may
be found in APP 3-40, Types of Actions, Appendix I, Normal Time
at Step.
3.
Off-Scale Salaries (APM Policy 620)
Off-scale
salaries may be used when necessary to meet competitive conditions.
(See APM Policy 620-14 for a complete list of eligible titles.)
Off-scale salaries for acting appointees are determined in the
same manner as for regular ranks. If counter offers arise during
the course of negotiations, the department should make an effort
to document these offers.
NOTE:
Off-scale salaries will be gradually returned to scale as new
salaries are determined at the time of subsequent personnel
actions. For further information, including limitations to off-scale
salaries, refer to APP
6-13, Guidelines for Off-Scale Salaries.
4.
Effective Date of Employment
The
effective date of an appointment for purposes of payroll and
other record keeping is the first day on which salary commences.
The beginning date of service for a new appointee, or of service
in a new title for a continuing appointee, is the first day
on which the appointee is required to be on duty under the terms
of the appointment. This date will be different from the effective
date for academic year (9-month) appointees paid over 12 months.
In
general, the following dates apply to regular 9-month faculty
who are paid over 12 months:
|
|
FALL
QUARTER |
WINTER
QUARTER |
SPRING
QUARTER |
|
Pay
Period Dates |
7/1
- 10/31 |
11/1
- 2/28-29 |
3/1
- 6/30 |
|
Pay
Period Months |
July
August
September
October |
November
December
January
February |
March
April
May
June |
|
Service
Period Dates |
Quarter
begin date - Quarter end date (e.g. 9/17 - 12/7) |
Quarter
begin date - Quarter end date (e.g.1/2 -3/22) |
Quarter
being date - Quarter end date (e.g. 3/27 - 6/15) |
|
Service
Period Months |
Mid-September
October
November
Early December |
Early
January February
Mid-March |
Late
March
April
May
Mid-June |
Further information may be found in the UCI Payroll Salary Scales
Manual in the pay and service period tables located behind the
first blue tab.
C.
OTHER APPOINTMENTS
1.
Split Appointments
Whenever a candidate is recommended for a split appointment (with
the FTE split between two departments), submissions on the individual's
behalf must include the recommendation of each department chair
and, in those instances in which report of faculty vote is required,
the submission must specify the result of consultation in each
department. The home department has the responsibility to obtain
the other department's recommendation.
2.
Joint Without Salary Appointments
An
individual appointed to a faculty title may be invited to hold
a joint without salary appointment in another department. Such
appointments, while easily renewable, are made on a year-to-year
basis. The home department may wish to solicit input from the
affiliated department prior to making personnel recommendations.
D.
VOLUNTARY INTRACAMPUS TRANSFERS
A
faculty member's salaried position is in a particular academic
unit, or is specifically divided between two or more academic
units.
1.
Transfer to Another Department Through FTE Reassignment
Instances arise where faculty members request that they and their
positions be transferred from one unit to another on campus. As
mentioned above, a faculty member's position, or job, is the position
in the academic unit to which he or she was appointed. Cases of
request to transfer will be addressed on an ad hoc basis.
The possibility of transfer of a faculty member and an FTE will
be decided by the Executive Vice Chancellor after thorough examination
of the request and the possible impact of the transfer. Consultation
about the effect of such a transfer will minimally include (a)
consent of the receiving department (including faculty vote) and
dean, (b) advice of the dean of the unit losing the faculty member
and FTE, and (c) advice of the Academic Planning Council.
2.
Transfer to Another Department Through Recruitment Process
There
may be cases where an academic unit has an FTE and seeks to
fill it through the appointment of a person who currently holds
a regular ranks appointment in another UCI academic unit (where,
in short, the request is to "transfer" the faculty member but
not the FTE). Properly speaking, this is a recruitment, rather
than a transfer. In such cases, recruitment procedures should
be followed. The formal recommendations must include an indication
of the faculty vote of the academic unit making the recommendation,
and must be accompanied by an indication that the recommending
unit can provide the necessary FTE and funding. Questions of
affirmative action search must be settled before the new appointment
("transfer") is proposed. Approval by the academic unit in which
the faculty member's present appointment exists is not required.
If the new appointment is approved, it will be considered an
intracampus transfer, at the same rank and step as the faculty
member's previous appointment, from which the faculty member
will resign. The FTE vacated in the faculty member's previous
academic unit will be subject to the normal procedures concerning
the allocation of resources and the use of faculty positions.
In
all cases of intracampus transfers of nontenured persons in
regular ranks positions, especially for those nearing the tenure
decision, the expected timing of the tenure decision, and the
role of both units (if necessary) in the tenure review, must
be made clear at the time of transfer.
References
- University Policy
APM
200 through 283, Appointment and Promotion
APM
500 through 570, Recruitment
APM
600 and 620,
Salary Administration
|