|
APP
4-15, Grievance and Appeal Procedures - Postdoctoral Scholars
Provides
an overview of the grievance process for Postdoctoral Scholars,
general provisions of the process, and step by step procedures
for filing an informal or formal grievance.
|
NON-SENATE
TITLES
I.
Policy
This
policy provides Postdoctoral Scholars the opportunity to present
grievances. The use of this policy shall not be discouraged by
the University by any means, either direct or indirect.
The
campus procedures as set out in the Academic Personnel Procedures
(APP) Section are intended to complement and supplement the University
policy in the Academic Personnel Manual (APM) Section APM
390-40, Postdoctoral Scholars-Grievances. This section, APP
4-15, must always be used with APM 390-40.
II.
Scope and Definition
A
grievance is a complaint filed by a Postdoctoral Scholar that
alleges one or both of the following:
A.
A specific act by the University was arbitrary or capricious
and adversely affected the Postdoctoral Scholar's then-existing
appointment or training program. For the purposes of this policy,
an act is not arbitrary or capricious if the decision-maker
exercised reasoned judgment.
B.
A violation of applicable University rules, regulations, or
policies occurred which adversely affected the Postdoctoral
Scholar's then-existing appointment or training program.
C.
A grievance alleging a violation of the Postdoctoral Scholar layoff
policy (APM
390-45) or the Postdoctoral Scholar corrective action and
dismissal policy (APM
390-50) shall be filed under APP 4-15, II B only.
III.
Grievance Liaison
The
Chancellor has designated the Office of Academic Personnel to
be the grievance liaison for this policy. Normally, the Assistant
Vice Chancellor for Academic Personnel will serve as the grievance
liaison. The Associate Executive Vice Chancellor (Associate EVC)
will normally be designated by the Executive Vice Chancellor to
act on his behalf and render the final decision for a grievance
appealed to Step III.
IV.
Mediation
This
policy encourages voluntary resolution including mediation when
it is desired by both parties. To arrange for mediation, please
contact the office of the Ombudsman.
V.
Step I - Informal Grievance Resolution
A.
Step I of the grievance process is an attempt at informal resolution,
which may include mediation. Postdoctoral Scholars are encouraged
to discuss concerns and/or complaints with their mentors, other
senior faculty members, department heads or the ombudsperson,
and to attempt informal resolution at an early stage. Attempts
at informal resolution do not extend the time limits for filing
a formal grievance unless a written extension is granted by
the grievance liaison.
B.
A Postdoctoral Scholar may ask the grievance liaison to assist
in resolving the grievance if informal resolution with the immediate
supervisor or responsible administrator has been unsuccessful.
C.
When a grievance alleges sexual harassment, the grievant may
elect to substitute for Step I the informal resolution procedure
"Procedures for Early Resolution, provided in the Guidelines
for Sexual Complaint Resolution (Section 700-17,
D.3).
If a Postdoctoral Scholar selects this mechanism and the complaint
is not resolved to the grievant's satisfaction, he or she may
file a Step II formal grievance in writing with the Grievance
Liaison within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date a decision
is issued or within forty-five (45) calendar days from the date
the grievant filed the sexual harassment complaint, whichever
is earlier.
VI.
Step II - Formal Grievance Review
A.
If a grievance is not resolved informally to the satisfaction
of the grievant, the Postdoctoral Scholar may file a Step II
formal grievance. A Step II grievance must be filed in writing
with the grievance liaison within thirty (30) calendar days
from the date on which the Postdoctoral Scholar knew, or could
reasonably be expected to know, of the event or act which gave
rise to the grievance, or within thirty (30) calendar days after
the date of separation, whichever is earlier. Except by written
mutual agreement of the parties, no additional issues shall
be introduced after the Step II grievance has been filed. A
written extension may be granted by the grievance liaison.
B.
The formal written grievance should be filed using AP Form UCI-AP-390-E
and must include the following information:
1.
Identify the specific administrative act or violation that
is being grieved;
2.
State either (i) the specific acts to be reviewed, the name
of the person(s) alleged to have carried out the administrative
act(s) and the date(s) the alleged act(s) occurred, and a
description of how the act(s) were arbitrary or capricious;
3.
Or (ii) the University rules, regulations or policies that
the grievant believes have been violated, the name of the
person(s) alleged to have done the violation(s), the date(s)
the alleged violations occurred, and a description of how
the rules, regulations, or policies have been violated;
4.
Specify how the Postdoctoral Scholar's then-existing appointment
or training program was adversely affected;
5.
Specify the remedy requested.
C.
Upon receipt of the formal written grievance, the grievance
liaison shall complete an initial review of the grievance and
determine whether the grievance is complete, timely, within
the jurisdiction of APM
390-40 and contains sufficient facts which support the allegations
made in the grievance.
Within
ten (10) calendar days, the grievance liaison shall notify the
Postdoctoral Scholar in writing of the acceptance of the grievance.
If the grievance is not accepted, the reasons shall be specified
as follows:
1.
If the grievance liaison determines that the grievance is
incomplete or factually insufficient, the grievant will have
ten (10) calendar days from the date of the written notice
to provide information to make the grievance complete. He/she
may include additional facts. If the grievant fails to make
the grievance complete or provide sufficient facts, the grievance
will be dismissed.
2.
If the grievance liaison determines the grievance is untimely
or outside the jurisdiction of APM 390-40, the grievance will
be dismissed.
3.
If the Postdoctoral Scholar raises multiple issues, the grievance
liaison will make a determination described above with regard
to each issue. The grievance liaison may accept some issues
and dismiss others pursuant to this review process.
4.
If all or part of the grievance is dismissed at this stage,
the grievance liaison will provide the grievant with written
explanation of the basis for dismissal.
D.
When a formal grievance is accepted, as part of the fact finding
process, the grievance liaison shall forward the grievance and
any supportive materials to the appropriate supervisor for comment
and any supporting documentation s/he may wish to provide.
Once the supervisor's response is received by the grievance
liaison, the grievance is forwarded to the Step II reviewer
for review and written decision. The Step II reviewer and the
grievant shall be notified of the date the Step II decision
is due. Generally, the Step II reviewer will be the department
or unit head. However, if the department of unit head took the
action which is being grieved, the grievance liaison may exercise
discretion and designate another individual as the Step II reviewer,
and so notify the department or unit head of the grievant.
E.
If a grievance raises allegations of discrimination, harassment
or retaliation in violation with APM - 035, (web link?) the
grievance liaison shall forward a copy of the grievance to the
appropriate campus compliance office for review. The results
of any related grievances or investigations shall be provided
to the grievance liaison. At the discretion of the grievance
liaison, information regarding related grievances or investigations
may be forwarded to the Step II reviewer for consideration in
making a decision.
F.
The Step II reviewer shall review the grievance and, if appropriate,
shall investigate and/or meet with the parties. Within thirty
(30) calendar days from the date of receipt of the formal grievance,
the Step II reviewer shall send a written response to the grievance
liaison who will then transmit it to the grievant. The response
will include a statement that the grievance is denied or upheld
in whole or in part. If the grievance is denied in whole or in
part, the response will state that the Postdoctoral Scholar has
the right to appeal the decision to Step III of the grievance
procedure; if the grievance is upheld, the response will describe
the remedy, if any, being awarded.
VII.
Step III - Formal Grievance Appeal
A.
A formal grievance not resolved to the satisfaction of the Postdoctoral
Scholar at Step II may be appealed for resolution in writing
to Step III with the grievance liaison within fifteen (15) calendar
days from the date on which the Step II response was issued.
B.
The Step III appeal must set forth the unresolved issue(s) and
the remedy requested. Except by written mutual agreement of the
parties, no issues shall be introduced in the appeal that were
not included in the original grievance.
C. All formal grievance appeals will be subject to the
Step III administrative consideration (use Form UCI-AP
390-F). Within seven (7) calendar days from receipt of a
formal grievance appeal, the grievance liaison shall forward
the appeal, the Step II formal grievance and the Step II response
to the Associate Executive Vice Chancellor for review and written
decision.
1.
In reviewing the grievance appeal, the Associate EVC may consult
with the Graduate Council, other appropriate Academic Senate
or administrative committees, or appropriate individuals.
2. Based
on the record, the Associate EVC shall determine whether the
Step II formal grievance was properly reviewed and whether
the decision made at Step II shall be upheld, rejected or
modified.
3.
The Associate EVC shall provide a final written decision to
the grievant within thirty (30) calendar days following receipt
of the formal grievance appeal. The written decision shall include
the reasons if the decision of Step II reviewer is rejected
or modified in whole or in part and a statement that the decision
is final.
VIII.
General Provisions
Representation
Grievants
may represent themselves or be represented by another person at
any stage of the process. The University shall be represented
as the Associate Executive Vice Chancellor deems appropriate.
The University may be provided with representation by the Office
of the General Counsel.
Time
Limits
Either
party may request an extension prior to the expiration of a time
limit.
If
the grievant fails to meet a deadline, the grievance will be considered
resolved on the basis of the last University response.
If
the University fails to meet a deadline, the grievant may move
the grievance to the next step in the process.
Time
limits which expire on days which are not business days shall
be automatically extended to the next University business day.
Pay
Status
The
Postdoctoral Scholar and the Postdoctoral Scholar's representative,
if employed by the University, shall be granted leave with pay
based on their regular pay status to attend hearings and meetings
convened by the University to consider grievances under APM
390-40.
Time
spent by the grievant or the grievant's representative in investigation
and preparation of a grievance shall not be on pay status.
Remedy
If
the grievance is sustained in whole or in part, the remedy shall
not exceed restoring to the Postdoctoral Scholar the pay, benefits,
or rights lost either as a result of the violation of University
rules, regulations, or policies, or as a result of an arbitrary
or capricious action, less any income earned from any other employment.
Payment
of attorney's fees shall not be part of the remedy.
Unless
specifically authorized by the grievance liaison, compensation
shall not be paid for any period that is a result of extension(s)
of time requested on behalf of the Postdoctoral Scholar.
Consolidation
of Grievances
The
grievance liaison may decide whether grievances will be consolidated.
The following may be consolidated in one review:
Grievances
of two or more Postdoctoral Scholars, where the grievances are
related and consolidation is appropriate under the circumstances;
Two
or more grievances filed by the same grievant which are based
on the same incident, issues, or act;
Two
or more grievances filed by the same grievant which are based
on the same pattern of conduct.
References
- University Policy
APM
390 , Postdoctoral Scholar Policy
APM
190, Appendix A,Whistle Blowing Policy
UCI Procedures Manual 700-06
UCI Policy & Procedures on Sexual Harassment and Complaint
Resolution (Section
700-17)
Forms:
The
following forms, which may be used for filing an academic personnel
grievance, are available for downloading. Hard copies of the
forms are available in department offices or may be requested
from Academic Personnel.
UCI-AP 390-E,
Request for Formal Review
UCI-AP 390-F,
Request for Appeal of Decision
|